{"geometry":{"coordinates":[24.75,37.083333333333336],"type":"Point"},"id":8913,"properties":{"icao_location":"LGGG","icao_text":"\nA0626/26 NOTAMN\nQ) LGGG/QAFXX/IV/NBO/E /000/999/3705N02445E341\nA) LGGG PART 1 OF 3 B) 2603112100 C) 2604112059\nE) NAVIGATIONAL WARNING TO ALL CONCERNED:\nREF (A) GREEK NOTAM A0619/26 (051156 EUECYIYN MAR 2026).\nREF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A0924/26 (061115 EUECYIYN MAR 2026).\nWITH REFERENCE TO REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A0099/26 WE POINT OUT THAT\nTHE ASSERTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE REJECTED AS MISLEADING AND\nDEVOID OF ANY LEGAL BASIS. IN THIS RESPECT AND FURTHER TO THE REF\n(A) GREEK NOTAM  A0619/26, PARA 2.2, WE REITERATE THAT GREECE,\nESTABLISHED IN 1931 IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW A\nTERRITORIAL SEA OF TEN NAUTICAL MILES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AVIATION\nAND THE CONTROL THEREOF.\nTHEREFORE, GREEK AIRSPACE DOES NOT EXCEED THE BREADTH OF THE\nTERRITORIAL SEA AS ESTABLISHED IN 1931.\nGREECE, THEREFORE,  FULLY ABIDES BY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND WILL\nCONTINUE TO DO SO WHILE FULLY EXERCISING ITS SOVEREIGNTY. IN FACT, AS\nFAR AS INTERNATIONAL LAW IS CONCERNED, TURKEY IS THE ONLY COUNTRY,\nREGRETTABLY, WHICH ALSO FAILS TO RESPECT THE PROVISIONS OF THE\nCHICAGO CONVENTION WITHIN THE ATHINAI FIR, WHERE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH\nTHE ICAO REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATION AGREEMENTS OF 1950-1952-1958, THE\nEND PART 1 OF 3\nA0626/26 NOTAMN\nQ) LGGG/QAFXX/IV/NBO/E /000/999/3705N02445E341\nA) LGGG PART 2 OF 3 B) 2603112100 C) 2604112059\nE) GREEK AUTHORITIES ARE THE ONLY COMPETENT AUTHORITIES CHARGED TO\nIMPLEMENT THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE CHICAGO CONVENTION AND TO\nENSURE UNIMPEDED, REGULAR AND SAFE AIR TRAFFIC.\nALSO, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE ABOVE REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A0924/26\nIN ORDER TO STATE THAT THE ATHINAI/ISTANBUL FIR BOUNDARY BETWEEN\nPOINTS 404500N0261000E AND 360500N0300000E HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY\nICAO REGIONAL AGREEMENTS (REACHED IN THE SECOND MIDDLE EAST REGIONAL\nAIR NAVIGATION MEETING, ISTANBUL 1950 AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED  BY\nTHE ICAO COUNCIL ON 14 DEC 1950, DOC 7055 MID/2-RAC) WITH THE\nPARTICIPATION AND APPROVAL OF TURKEY AND IN FEB 1958, (DOC 7870,\nEUM/IV) AND CONSEQUENTLY IS FOUNDED ON THE FIRMEST POSSIBLE LEGAL\nBASIS AS NOTED IN OUR A1709/07 LGGGYNYX NOTAM.\nFURTHERMORE THE SAID ATHINAI/ISTANBUL FIR BOUNDARY WAS DEPICTED ON\nCHART NUMBER 7 ATTACHED TO THE REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATION AGREEMENT\nWHICH WAS REACHED IN THE THIRD REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATIONAL CONFERENCE\n(PARIS 1952) AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED BY THE ICAO COUNCIL ON 23\nJUNE 1952. ACCORDINGLY, GREECE HAS BEEN ASIGNED RESPONSIBILITY FOR\nALL ATM\nSERVICES AND ICAO PURPOSES AS WELL AS FOR SAR  WITHIN\nATHINAI FIR/ HELLAS UIR AND IS THE ONLY COMPETENT THEREIN.\nFINALLY, THE ADDITIONAL PROVISION MENTIONED IN PARAGRAPH 2.3 OF \nTHE REF (A) GREEK NOTAM A0619/26 (051156 EUECYIYN MAR 2026) AIM AT\nTHE PROMOTION OF SAFETY, REGULARITY AND EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL\nEND PART 2 OF 3\nA0626/26 NOTAMN\nQ) LGGG/QAFXX/IV/NBO/E /000/999/3705N02445E341\nA) LGGG PART 3 OF 3 B) 2603112100 C) 2604112059\nE) AIR NAVIGATION AND FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES\nIN\nCONFORMITY WITH ARTICLE 3 (D) OF THE ICAO CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL\nCIVIL AVIATION AS AMPLIFIED BY THE A40-04 ICAO ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS,\nAPPENDIX I, RESOLVING  CLAUSE 2, SEE ALSO THE ANNEX 2, APPENDIX 4, TO\nTHE ICAO CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION AS WELL AS\nARTICLE 12 OF THE ICAO CONVENTION AND THE ESTABLISHED INTERNATIONAL\nPRACTICE. CONSEQUENTLY, THE POINTS RAISED BY TURKEY IN REF (B)\nTURKISH NOTAM A0924/26 (061115 EUECYIYN MAR 2026), ARE IRRELEVANT AND\nTHE SAID NOTAM IS NULL AND VOID AND NOT APPLICABLE TO ATHINAI FIR/\nHELLAS \nUIR. THE REQUIREMENTS EXPRESSED IN THE REF (A) GREEK NOTAM\nA0619/26 ARE FULLY IN FORCE.\nEND PART 3 OF 3\n","id":8913,"notam_number":"A0626/26","radius_nm":341.0,"raw_text":" NAVIGATIONAL WARNING TO ALL CONCERNED:\nREF (A) GREEK NOTAM A0619/26 (051156 EUECYIYN MAR 2026).\nREF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A0924/26 (061115 EUECYIYN MAR 2026).\nWITH REFERENCE TO REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A0099/26 WE POINT OUT THAT\nTHE ASSERTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE REJECTED AS MISLEADING AND\nDEVOID OF ANY LEGAL BASIS. IN THIS RESPECT AND FURTHER TO THE REF\n(A) GREEK NOTAM  A0619/26, PARA 2.2, WE REITERATE THAT GREECE,\nESTABLISHED IN 1931 IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW A\nTERRITORIAL SEA OF TEN NAUTICAL MILES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AVIATION\nAND THE CONTROL THEREOF.\nTHEREFORE, GREEK AIRSPACE DOES NOT EXCEED THE BREADTH OF THE\nTERRITORIAL SEA AS ESTABLISHED IN 1931.\nGREECE, THEREFORE,  FULLY ABIDES BY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND WILL\nCONTINUE TO DO SO WHILE FULLY EXERCISING ITS SOVEREIGNTY. IN FACT, AS\nFAR AS INTERNATIONAL LAW IS CONCERNED, TURKEY IS THE ONLY COUNTRY,\nREGRETTABLY, WHICH ALSO FAILS TO RESPECT THE PROVISIONS OF THE\nCHICAGO CONVENTION WITHIN THE ATHINAI FIR, WHERE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH\nTHE ICAO REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATION AGREEMENTS OF 1950-1952-1958, THE\nEND PART 1 OF 3\nGREEK AUTHORITIES ARE THE ONLY COMPETENT AUTHORITIES CHARGED TO\nIMPLEMENT THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE CHICAGO CONVENTION AND TO\nENSURE UNIMPEDED, REGULAR AND SAFE AIR TRAFFIC.\nALSO, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE ABOVE REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A0924/26\nIN ORDER TO STATE THAT THE ATHINAI/ISTANBUL FIR BOUNDARY BETWEEN\nPOINTS 404500N0261000E AND 360500N0300000E HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY\nICAO REGIONAL AGREEMENTS (REACHED IN THE SECOND MIDDLE EAST REGIONAL\nAIR NAVIGATION MEETING, ISTANBUL 1950 AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED  BY\nTHE ICAO COUNCIL ON 14 DEC 1950, DOC 7055 MID/2-RAC) WITH THE\nPARTICIPATION AND APPROVAL OF TURKEY AND IN FEB 1958, (DOC 7870,\nEUM/IV) AND CONSEQUENTLY IS FOUNDED ON THE FIRMEST POSSIBLE LEGAL\nBASIS AS NOTED IN OUR A1709/07 LGGGYNYX NOTAM.\nFURTHERMORE THE SAID ATHINAI/ISTANBUL FIR BOUNDARY WAS DEPICTED ON\nCHART NUMBER 7 ATTACHED TO THE REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATION AGREEMENT\nWHICH WAS REACHED IN THE THIRD REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATIONAL CONFERENCE\n(PARIS 1952) AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED BY THE ICAO COUNCIL ON 23\nJUNE 1952. ACCORDINGLY, GREECE HAS BEEN ASIGNED RESPONSIBILITY FOR\nALL ATM\nSERVICES AND ICAO PURPOSES AS WELL AS FOR SAR  WITHIN\nATHINAI FIR/ HELLAS UIR AND IS THE ONLY COMPETENT THEREIN.\nFINALLY, THE ADDITIONAL PROVISION MENTIONED IN PARAGRAPH 2.3 OF \nTHE REF (A) GREEK NOTAM A0619/26 (051156 EUECYIYN MAR 2026) AIM AT\nTHE PROMOTION OF SAFETY, REGULARITY AND EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL\nEND PART 2 OF 3\nAIR NAVIGATION AND FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES\nIN\nCONFORMITY WITH ARTICLE 3 (D) OF THE ICAO CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL\nCIVIL AVIATION AS AMPLIFIED BY THE A40-04 ICAO ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS,\nAPPENDIX I, RESOLVING  CLAUSE 2, SEE ALSO THE ANNEX 2, APPENDIX 4, TO\nTHE ICAO CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION AS WELL AS\nARTICLE 12 OF THE ICAO CONVENTION AND THE ESTABLISHED INTERNATIONAL\nPRACTICE. CONSEQUENTLY, THE POINTS RAISED BY TURKEY IN REF (B)\nTURKISH NOTAM A0924/26 (061115 EUECYIYN MAR 2026), ARE IRRELEVANT AND\nTHE SAID NOTAM IS NULL AND VOID AND NOT APPLICABLE TO ATHINAI FIR/\nHELLAS \nUIR. THE REQUIREMENTS EXPRESSED IN THE REF (A) GREEK NOTAM\nA0619/26 ARE FULLY IN FORCE.\nEND PART 3 OF 3\n","status":"CANCELLED"},"type":"Feature"}