← back

!! NOT FOR OPERATIONAL USE !! data may be stale, incomplete, or wrong

raw text:

 NAVIGATIONAL WARNING TO ALL CONCERNED:
REF (A) GREEK NOTAM A0986/26 (021154 EUECYIYN APR 2026).
REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A1307/26 (031548 EUECYIYN APR 2026).
WITH REFERENCE TO REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A1307/26 WE POINT OUT THAT
THE ASSERTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE REJECTED AS MISLEADING AND
DEVOID OF ANY LEGAL BASIS. IN THIS RESPECT AND FURTHER TO THE REF
(A) GREEK NOTAM A0986/26, PARA 2.2, WE REITERATE THAT GREECE,
ESTABLISHED IN 1931 IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW A
TERRITORIAL SEA OF TEN NAUTICAL MILES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AVIATION
AND THE CONTROL THEREOF.
THEREFORE, GREEK AIRSPACE DOES NOT EXCEED THE BREADTH OF THE
TERRITORIAL SEA AS ESTABLISHED IN 1931.
GREECE, THEREFORE,  FULLY ABIDES BY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND WILL
CONTINUE TO DO SO WHILE FULLY EXERCISING ITS SOVEREIGNTY. IN FACT, AS
FAR AS INTERNATIONAL LAW IS CONCERNED, TURKEY IS THE ONLY COUNTRY,
REGRETTABLY, WHICH ALSO FAILS TO RESPECT THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CHICAGO CONVENTION WITHIN THE ATHINAI FIR, WHERE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE ICAO REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATION AGREEMENTS OF 1950-1952-1958, THE
GREEK AUTHORITIES ARE THE ONLY COMPETENT AUTHORITIES CHARGED TO
IMPLEMENT THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE CHICAGO CONVENTION AND TO
ENSURE UNIMPEDED, REGULAR AND SAFE AIR TRAFFIC.
ALSO, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE ABOVE REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A1307/26
IN ORDER TO STATE THAT THE ATHINAI/ISTANBUL FIR BOUNDARY BETWEEN
POINTS 404500N0261000E AND 360500N0300000E HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY
ICAO REGIONAL AGREEMENTS (REACHED IN THE SECOND MIDDLE EAST REGIONAL
AIR NAVIGATION MEETING, ISTANBUL 1950 AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED  BY
THE ICAO COUNCIL ON 14 DEC 1950, DOC 7055 MID/2-RAC) WITH THE
PARTICIPATION AND APPROVAL OF TURKEY AND IN FEB 1958, (DOC 7870,
EUM/IV) AND CONSEQUENTLY IS FOUNDED ON THE FIRMEST POSSIBLE LEGAL
BASIS AS NOTED IN OUR A1709/07 LGGGYNYX NOTAM.
FURTHERMORE THE SAID ATHINAI/ISTANBUL FIR BOUNDARY WAS DEPICTED ON
CHART NUMBER 7 ATTACHED TO THE REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATION AGREEMENT
WHICH WAS REACHED IN THE THIRD REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATIONAL CONFERENCE
(PARIS 1952) AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED BY THE ICAO COUNCIL ON 23
JUNE 1952.
ACCORDINGLY, GREECE HAS BEEN ASIGNED RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL ATM
SERVICES AND ICAO PURPOSES AS WELL AS FOR SAR  WITHIN
ATHINAI FIR/ HELLAS UIR AND IS THE ONLY COMPETENT THEREIN.
FINALLY, THE ADDITIONAL PROVISION MENTIONED IN PARAGRAPH 2.3 OF 
THE REF (A) GREEK NOTAM A0986/26 (021154 EUECYIYN APR 2026) AIM AT
THE PROMOTION OF SAFETY, REGULARITY AND EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL
AIR NAVIGATION AND FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES IN
CONFORMITY WITH ARTICLE 3 (D) OF THE ICAO CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL
CIVIL AVIATION AS AMPLIFIED BY THE A40-04 ICAO ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS,
APPENDIX I, RESOLVING  CLAUSE 2, SEE ALSO THE ANNEX 2, APPENDIX 4, TO
THE ICAO CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION AS WELL AS
ARTICLE 12 OF THE ICAO CONVENTION AND THE ESTABLISHED INTERNATIONAL
PRACTICE.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE POINTS RAISED BY TURKEY IN REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM
A1307/26 (031548 EUECYIYN APR 2026), ARE IRRELEVANT AND THE SAID

icao text:

A1011/26 NOTAMN
Q) LGGG/QAFXX/IV/NBO/E /000/999/3705N02445E341
A) LGGG PART 1 OF 3 B) 2604112100 C) 2605112059
E) NAVIGATIONAL WARNING TO ALL CONCERNED:
REF (A) GREEK NOTAM A0986/26 (021154 EUECYIYN APR 2026).
REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A1307/26 (031548 EUECYIYN APR 2026).
WITH REFERENCE TO REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A1307/26 WE POINT OUT THAT
THE ASSERTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE REJECTED AS MISLEADING AND
DEVOID OF ANY LEGAL BASIS. IN THIS RESPECT AND FURTHER TO THE REF
(A) GREEK NOTAM A0986/26, PARA 2.2, WE REITERATE THAT GREECE,
ESTABLISHED IN 1931 IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW A
TERRITORIAL SEA OF TEN NAUTICAL MILES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AVIATION
AND THE CONTROL THEREOF.
THEREFORE, GREEK AIRSPACE DOES NOT EXCEED THE BREADTH OF THE
TERRITORIAL SEA AS ESTABLISHED IN 1931.
GREECE, THEREFORE,  FULLY ABIDES BY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND WILL
CONTINUE TO DO SO WHILE FULLY EXERCISING ITS SOVEREIGNTY. IN FACT, AS
FAR AS INTERNATIONAL LAW IS CONCERNED, TURKEY IS THE ONLY COUNTRY,
REGRETTABLY, WHICH ALSO FAILS TO RESPECT THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CHICAGO CONVENTION WITHIN THE ATHINAI FIR, WHERE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE ICAO REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATION AGREEMENTS OF 1950-1952-1958, THE
GREEK AUTHORITIES ARE THE ONLY COMPETENT AUTHORITIES CHARGED TO
IMPLEMENT THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE CHICAGO CONVENTION AND TO
ENSURE UNIMPEDED, REGULAR AND SAFE AIR TRAFFIC.
ALSO, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE ABOVE REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM A1307/26
IN ORDER TO STATE THAT THE ATHINAI/ISTANBUL FIR BOUNDARY BETWEEN
POINTS 404500N0261000E AND 360500N0300000E HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY
ICAO REGIONAL AGREEMENTS (REACHED IN THE SECOND MIDDLE EAST REGIONAL
A1011/26 NOTAMN
Q) LGGG/QAFXX/IV/NBO/E /000/999/3705N02445E341
A) LGGG PART 2 OF 3 B) 2604112100 C) 2605112059
E) AIR NAVIGATION MEETING, ISTANBUL 1950 AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED  BY
THE ICAO COUNCIL ON 14 DEC 1950, DOC 7055 MID/2-RAC) WITH THE
PARTICIPATION AND APPROVAL OF TURKEY AND IN FEB 1958, (DOC 7870,
EUM/IV) AND CONSEQUENTLY IS FOUNDED ON THE FIRMEST POSSIBLE LEGAL
BASIS AS NOTED IN OUR A1709/07 LGGGYNYX NOTAM.
FURTHERMORE THE SAID ATHINAI/ISTANBUL FIR BOUNDARY WAS DEPICTED ON
CHART NUMBER 7 ATTACHED TO THE REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATION AGREEMENT
WHICH WAS REACHED IN THE THIRD REGIONAL AIR NAVIGATIONAL CONFERENCE
(PARIS 1952) AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED BY THE ICAO COUNCIL ON 23
JUNE 1952.
ACCORDINGLY, GREECE HAS BEEN ASIGNED RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL ATM
SERVICES AND ICAO PURPOSES AS WELL AS FOR SAR  WITHIN
ATHINAI FIR/ HELLAS UIR AND IS THE ONLY COMPETENT THEREIN.
FINALLY, THE ADDITIONAL PROVISION MENTIONED IN PARAGRAPH 2.3 OF 
THE REF (A) GREEK NOTAM A0986/26 (021154 EUECYIYN APR 2026) AIM AT
THE PROMOTION OF SAFETY, REGULARITY AND EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL
AIR NAVIGATION AND FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES IN
CONFORMITY WITH ARTICLE 3 (D) OF THE ICAO CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL
CIVIL AVIATION AS AMPLIFIED BY THE A40-04 ICAO ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS,
APPENDIX I, RESOLVING  CLAUSE 2, SEE ALSO THE ANNEX 2, APPENDIX 4, TO
THE ICAO CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION AS WELL AS
ARTICLE 12 OF THE ICAO CONVENTION AND THE ESTABLISHED INTERNATIONAL
PRACTICE.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE POINTS RAISED BY TURKEY IN REF (B) TURKISH NOTAM
A1307/26 (031548 EUECYIYN APR 2026), ARE IRRELEVANT AND THE SAID

downloads:

• raw AIXM 5.1 XML
• GeoJSON Feature

!! NOT FOR OPERATIONAL USE !! data may be stale, incomplete, or wrong

© 2026 coredoes.dev